You’re Killing Me review – did an AI monkey write this terrible Brooke Shields crime caper?
I desperately wanted this show to be Gilmore Girls meets Murder, She Wrote – but the story of a novelist turned amateur sleuth is just so lazy. And yet, I still have high hopes for the confirmed second season Look, we all want Brooke Shields to be in gainful employment. We all want her to have a fabulous third act to her career. God knows, the child model turned star of prurient fever dreams Pretty Baby and The Blue
Open original article- Ledger record
- #1621
- First seen
- 21 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC
- Last checked
- 21 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC
- Version history
- 1 version
- Current fingerprint
f31052b3fe01...0845c1
Publisher layer
Recorded article metadata
- Publisher
- The Guardian
- Country
- England / United Kingdom
- Source published
- 21 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC
- Source updated
- No update timestamp supplied
- Byline
- Lucy Mangan
- Section
- Television & radio
I desperately wanted this show to be Gilmore Girls meets Murder, She Wrote – but the story of a novelist turned amateur sleuth is just so lazy. And yet, I still have high hopes for the confirmed second season Look, we all want Brooke Shields to be in gainful employment. We all want her to have a fabulous third act to her career. God knows, the child model turned star of prurient fever dreams Pretty Baby and The Blue
Change layer
Observed version timeline
-
1
You’re Killing Me review – did an AI monkey write this terrible Brooke Shields crime caper?
I desperately wanted this show to be Gilmore Girls meets Murder, She Wrote – but the story of a novelist turned amateur sleuth is just so lazy. And yet, I still have high hopes for the confirmed second season Look, we all want Brooke Shields to be in gainful employment. We all want her to have a fabulous third act to her career. God knows, the child model turned star of prurient fever dreams Pretty Baby and The Blue
Changed fieldstitlebylinedescriptionTextcontentTextsourcePublishedAtsourceUpdatedAtsectionimageUrltags- Version SHA-256
f31052b3fe01...0845c1- Capture SHA-256
ab07220b11a2...6c7514
Interpretation layer
Labels with declared origins
Publisher categories are copied from source metadata. Machine signals report observable wording or format and do not determine truth, intent, ethics, or wrongdoing.
- machine content-type Analysis or opinion observable-rules-v1 / 70% rule confidence
- machine language-signal Investigation language observable-rules-v1 / 65% rule confidence
- publisher category Culture rss-category
- publisher category TV comedy rss-category
- publisher category TV crime drama rss-category
- publisher category Television rss-category
- publisher category Television & radio rss-category
Public response layer
Reception snapshots
Comment counts and samples remain absent until a lawful, source-specific capture method is reviewed. Absence is recorded instead of estimated.
Evidence layer
Capture provenance
- Capture ID
- #965
- Observed
- 21 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC
- HTTP result
- 200 / parsed
- Raw payload
- 455,662 bytes, private gzip evidence
- Collector
- news-ledger/0.1
- Public boundary
- metadata and excerpt