Back to ledger
GBThe GuardianSocial housing

We need public records on the delivery of social housing | Letter

Marco Scalvini on why it’s necessary to know what was promised by developers and local authorities, what arrived and what it costs to live in social housing Your editorial on London’s social housing (16 August) makes a persuasive case for treating social housing as economic infrastructure. However, infrastructure is normally monitored and social housing is not, either when it is delivered or across the years in which

Open original article
Ledger record
#2408
First seen
24 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC
Last checked
25 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC
Version history
1 version
Current fingerprint
482e05f5580d...840e91
01

Publisher layer

Recorded article metadata

Publisher
The Guardian
Country
England / United Kingdom
Source published
24 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC
Source updated
No update timestamp supplied
Byline
Guardian Staff
Section
Social housing
Source-supplied excerpt
Marco Scalvini on why it’s necessary to know what was promised by developers and local authorities, what arrived and what it costs to live in social housing Your editorial on London’s social housing (16 August) makes a persuasive case for treating social housing as economic infrastructure. However, infrastructure is normally monitored and social housing is not, either when it is delivered or across the years in which
02

Change layer

Observed version timeline

  1. 1
    Initial capture

    We need public records on the delivery of social housing | Letter

    Marco Scalvini on why it’s necessary to know what was promised by developers and local authorities, what arrived and what it costs to live in social housing Your editorial on London’s social housing (16 August) makes a persuasive case for treating social housing as economic infrastructure. However, infrastructure is normally monitored and social housing is not, either when it is delivered or across the years in which

    Changed fieldstitlebylinedescriptionTextcontentTextsourcePublishedAtsourceUpdatedAtsectionimageUrltags
    Version SHA-256
    482e05f5580d...840e91
    Capture SHA-256
    1ae75471f015...e65efa
03

Interpretation layer

Labels with declared origins

Not an adjudication.

Publisher categories are copied from source metadata. Machine signals report observable wording or format and do not determine truth, intent, ethics, or wrongdoing.

  • machine content-type Analysis or opinion observable-rules-v1 / 70% rule confidence
  • publisher category Construction industry rss-category
  • publisher category Housing rss-category
  • publisher category Local government rss-category
  • publisher category London rss-category
  • publisher category Planning policy rss-category
  • publisher category Property rss-category
  • publisher category Renting property rss-category
  • publisher category Social housing rss-category
04

Public response layer

Reception snapshots

No reviewed reception capture yet.

Comment counts and samples remain absent until a lawful, source-specific capture method is reviewed. Absence is recorded instead of estimated.

05

Evidence layer

Capture provenance

Capture ID
#2072
Observed
24 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC
HTTP result
200 / parsed
Raw payload
470,421 bytes, private gzip evidence
Collector
news-ledger/0.1
Public boundary
metadata and excerpt