Back to ledger
GBThe GuardianUS press and publishing

‘The day I disclose, my career is over’: the journalist facing an $800 daily fine to keep her sources secret

If Catherine Herridge’s petition to the US supreme court fails, she’ll be on the hook for a daily fine until she discloses her sources – a case unsettling press freedom organizations For 18 days this summer, veteran journalist Catherine Herridge walked to her Washington DC mailbox and dropped off a check for $800. The money was required by law to cover a judge-imposed sanction after she was found in contempt of court

Open original article
Ledger record
#2649
First seen
25 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC
Last checked
26 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC
Version history
1 version
Current fingerprint
6c9f7d940ae6...b2d7c4
01

Publisher layer

Recorded article metadata

Publisher
The Guardian
Country
England / United Kingdom
Source published
25 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC
Source updated
No update timestamp supplied
Byline
Jeremy Barr in Washington
Section
US press and publishing
Source-supplied excerpt
If Catherine Herridge’s petition to the US supreme court fails, she’ll be on the hook for a daily fine until she discloses her sources – a case unsettling press freedom organizations For 18 days this summer, veteran journalist Catherine Herridge walked to her Washington DC mailbox and dropped off a check for $800. The money was required by law to cover a judge-imposed sanction after she was found in contempt of court
02

Change layer

Observed version timeline

  1. 1
    Initial capture

    ‘The day I disclose, my career is over’: the journalist facing an $800 daily fine to keep her sources secret

    If Catherine Herridge’s petition to the US supreme court fails, she’ll be on the hook for a daily fine until she discloses her sources – a case unsettling press freedom organizations For 18 days this summer, veteran journalist Catherine Herridge walked to her Washington DC mailbox and dropped off a check for $800. The money was required by law to cover a judge-imposed sanction after she was found in contempt of court

    Changed fieldstitlebylinedescriptionTextcontentTextsourcePublishedAtsourceUpdatedAtsectionimageUrltags
    Version SHA-256
    6c9f7d940ae6...b2d7c4
    Capture SHA-256
    8a539e314e4b...e71354
03

Interpretation layer

Labels with declared origins

Not an adjudication.

Publisher categories are copied from source metadata. Machine signals report observable wording or format and do not determine truth, intent, ethics, or wrongdoing.

  • machine content-type Reported news observable-rules-v1 / 70% rule confidence
  • publisher category Business rss-category
  • publisher category Donald Trump rss-category
  • publisher category Fox News rss-category
  • publisher category Law rss-category
  • publisher category Law (US) rss-category
  • publisher category Media rss-category
  • publisher category US news rss-category
  • publisher category US press and publishing rss-category
  • publisher category US supreme court rss-category
04

Public response layer

Reception snapshots

No reviewed reception capture yet.

Comment counts and samples remain absent until a lawful, source-specific capture method is reviewed. Absence is recorded instead of estimated.

05

Evidence layer

Capture provenance

Capture ID
#2356
Observed
25 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC
HTTP result
200 / parsed
Raw payload
474,869 bytes, private gzip evidence
Collector
news-ledger/0.1
Public boundary
metadata and excerpt