News Ledger Evidence preview
Back to ledger
IEThe Irish Times

Coyote vs Acme review: Warner Bros tried to shelve this film. It’s far too good for that

This zesty film makes the best use yet of Looney Tunes’ immortal characters on the big screen

By Donald Clarke
Open original article
Ledger record
#517
First seen
19 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC
Last checked
19 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC
Version history
2 versions
Current fingerprint
b5974a77e51b...1b0460
01

Publisher layer

Recorded article metadata

Image URL supplied by The Irish Times.
Publisher
The Irish Times
Country
Ireland
Source published
19 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC
Source updated
No update timestamp supplied
Byline
Donald Clarke
Section
Not supplied
Source-supplied excerpt
This zesty film makes the best use yet of Looney Tunes’ immortal characters on the big screen
02

Change layer

Observed version timeline

  1. 2
    Revision observed

    Coyote vs Acme review: Warner Bros tried to shelve this film. It’s far too good for that

    This zesty film makes the best use yet of Looney Tunes’ immortal characters on the big screen

    Changed fieldscontentText
    Version SHA-256
    b5974a77e51b...1b0460
    Capture SHA-256
    5031e0f05f6e...a4e343
  2. 1
    Initial capture

    Coyote vs Acme review: Warner Bros tried to shelve this film. It’s far too good for that

    This zesty film makes the best use yet of Looney Tunes’ immortal characters on the big screen

    Changed fieldstitlebylinedescriptionTextcontentTextsourcePublishedAtsourceUpdatedAtsectionimageUrltags
    Version SHA-256
    aa47ac87ff72...f2eca7
    Capture SHA-256
    360974979045...67c22d
03

Interpretation layer

Labels with declared origins

Not an adjudication.

Publisher categories are copied from source metadata. Machine signals report observable wording or format and do not determine truth, intent, ethics, or wrongdoing.

  • machine content-type Analysis or opinion observable-rules-v1 / 70% rule confidence
  • machine language-signal Investigation language observable-rules-v1 / 65% rule confidence
04

Public response layer

Reception snapshots

No reviewed reception capture yet.

Comment counts and samples remain absent until a lawful, source-specific capture method is reviewed. Absence is recorded instead of estimated.

05

Evidence layer

Capture provenance

Capture ID
#35
Observed
19 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC
HTTP result
200 / parsed
Raw payload
561,721 bytes, private gzip evidence
Collector
news-ledger/0.1
Public boundary
metadata and excerpt
Official source feedPublisher terms